Circulating supply verification on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko

Why supply verification matters in crypto search

Circulating supply verification gives your project a defensible explanation of the number reported on its tracker profiles. Consistent, well-supported data can make it easier for people and AI search tools to understand your token rather than encounter conflicting figures without context.

The objective is not simply to submit a number. It is to connect that number to a calculation, the treatment of relevant wallets, and evidence that a reviewer can follow. When the same token has different supply figures across profiles or project materials, readers may struggle to tell which figure is current and why it differs.

AIPromote starts with a supply narrative review: we compare your proposed figure with the project’s published token information and identify gaps that could make the explanation hard to verify. The resulting record can also inform your wider listings and verification plan, including how you prepare a CoinMarketCap listing or a CoinGecko listing.

Before starting, your team should be able to identify the token contract, explain how the reported figure was calculated, and provide sources for balances treated as unavailable to the market. If those pieces do not match, resolve the mismatch before asking a platform to review the figure.

What evidence supports a circulating-supply figure?

A circulating-supply figure is a project’s documented view of the tokens considered available to the market under its stated methodology. The important part of verification is explaining what is included, what is excluded, and why each classification is reasonable.

Prepare a concise evidence pack rather than a collection of unrelated documents. It should let a reviewer trace the calculation and understand the treatment of the relevant balances. Depending on your token model, useful materials may include:

• The contract address and the chain or chains where the token exists.
• A supply calculation that distinguishes total supply from the circulating figure.
• Wallet addresses for locked, vesting, treasury, or otherwise restricted balances, with their purpose explained.
• Vesting or lock documentation that supports any stated restrictions.
• A short methodology note describing how burns, emissions, and unlocks affect the calculation.
• Project pages or announcements that use the same current figure and terminology.

Do not label an address as non-circulating without explaining the basis for that treatment. A wallet label alone may not tell a reviewer whether tokens are locked, reserved, or available. A practical preparation step is to create a table with the address, balance source, classification, supporting document, and explanation. Keep the figures and wording consistent across the application and public materials.

How does the CoinGecko supply verification process differ from CoinMarketCap?

The CoinGecko supply verification process and CoinMarketCap review both require a clear account of the reported supply, but each platform handles its own profile review. A project can prepare a consistent evidence pack for both while submitting through the relevant platform process and responding to the questions it receives.

For each submission, make the claim easy to check: identify the token, state the proposed circulating figure, show how it was derived, and connect excluded balances to supporting evidence. Use the platform’s current submission instructions rather than relying on an old checklist. For context, our supply verification guide explains the documentation logic, while CoinMarketCap community verification covers a separate profile-related service.

A clean comparison sheet helps prevent accidental contradictions:

Do not assume that approval or a displayed value on one tracker automatically changes the other. Keep a record of each submission, its supporting files, and any response so the team can make a precise, platform-specific update.

What does AIPromote deliver for supply verification?

AIPromote turns your token data into a reviewable submission package and coordinates the work around the project’s actual supply model. You receive a structured review, not a generic template that leaves your team to guess which balances need explanation.

The engagement typically covers:

• An intake review of your contract details, current supply claims, and available evidence.
• A consistency check across the proposed figure, wallet classifications, token documentation, and public-facing descriptions.
• A list of missing or unclear support, organized so the right project owner can provide it.
• Preparation of platform-ready explanations and submission materials for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko.
• Follow-up coordination, including organizing platform questions and helping prepare clear responses based on your records.
• A handover note showing what was submitted, what remains open, and what should be updated if supply changes.

A named account lead keeps the evidence trail organized. Our pre-submission review checks that each excluded balance has a stated reason and that the same figure appears consistently in the supporting material. Your team remains the source of truth for contract facts and wallet control; we help make that information coherent and ready to present.

The service is priced from $1,390 / project. The scope is confirmed after reviewing the number of relevant contracts, the quality of existing documentation, and whether both platforms need submissions or follow-up.

How we move from supply data to platform submission

The workflow moves from evidence review to a documented submission, with project sign-off before materials are sent. This prevents avoidable inconsistencies and gives your team a clear view of what is being represented to each tracker.

1. Kickoff checklist: We collect contract details, current supply claims, wallet classifications, and relevant project documents.
2. Method review: We map the calculation and flag balances whose classification or supporting evidence needs clarification.
3. Project confirmation: Your team confirms factual details and supplies missing records; we do not invent explanations for wallet activity.
4. Submission preparation: We adapt the evidence and explanation to the relevant CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko processes.
5. Follow-up and handover: We organize responses, track open questions, and provide a record of submitted materials and next actions.

The schedule begins once the essential information is available. A straightforward evidence pack can move directly into preparation; unclear ownership, incomplete lock documentation, or conflicting public figures may require project-side resolution first. Platform review time is separate from our preparation time, so we keep those stages visible in the status update.

For connected listing work, teams can pair this service with contract migration and rebranding updates or other crypto tracker listings. That helps keep token identity and supply explanations aligned across project profiles.

What can the project control during platform review?

Your team can control the accuracy, clarity, and completeness of the evidence it submits; it cannot control how CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko assesses that evidence. Each platform may request more information, decline a proposed classification, or display supply data according to its own review and methodology, so approval and identical figures across profiles cannot be promised.

The best way to reduce avoidable friction is to make every claim traceable. Keep the calculation reproducible, explain wallet restrictions in plain language, and ensure that public token materials do not contradict the submission. If supply changes later through unlocks, emissions, burns, or another project action, reassess the calculation and update the relevant records rather than reusing a stale explanation.

For broader listing support, see the listings and verification hub. If a profile has an unrelated information issue, our listing profile remediation service addresses that separate task. Send AIPromote your contract details, current supply explanation, and the evidence you already have; we will review the gaps and return a clear scope and next steps.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Share the token recordSend the contract details, current circulating figure, and public supply references. We confirm what evidence is available before defining the review scope.
2. Map balances and classificationsWe organize the relevant wallets and review the basis for including or excluding their balances. Your team confirms facts that require project knowledge.
3. Close evidence gapsWe identify unclear or unsupported claims and list the specific documents or explanations needed before submission.
4. Prepare platform materialsWe shape the confirmed calculation and evidence into clear submission materials for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko.
5. Coordinate follow-upWe help organize platform questions and provide a handover record of submissions, responses, and any remaining actions.